A comparison of PCR products in liquid - and solid phase

  1. Introduction
  2. Data from a comparison between DIAPOPS and liquid phase product concentration
  3. Difference between standard symmetrical PCR and asymmetrical PCR
  4. Conclusion

1. Introduction
In the first cycles of the DNA amplification in DIAPOPS Introduction), PCR products are only synthesized in the liquid phase. When enough liquid phase products are created, they will start to recognize the solid phase primer, and the solid phase amplification is initiated ( DIAPOPS). As more liquid phase products are synthesized, more solid phase products are also produced. The amount of solid phase products is therefore directly proportional to the amount of liquid phase products. However, the actual ratio between solid phase products and liquid phase products will vary from one system to the other. For this reason, no fixed ratio can be given between the amount of solid phase product and the concentration of liquid phase product after the amplification.

2. Data from a comparison between DIAPOPS and liquid phase product concentration
Figures 1 and 2 present results from both DIAPOPS and liquid phase product concentration from two different systems. With both of these systems, as with all other systems tested, there is a good correlation between the DIAPOPS signals and the liquid phase product concentration, and all bands detected on agarose gel are detected with DIAPOPS. The system shown in Figure 1 yields a better detection limit with DIAPOPS compared to the agarose gel whereas the system shown in Figure 2 yields identical limits of detection with both liquid phase agarose gel electrophoresis and DIAPOPS.


Figure 1: The left-hand picture shows the analysis of liquid phase PCR products on an agarose gel. The right-hand diagram shows the corresponding DIAPOPS signals and the quantification of the liquid phase PCR product. The quantification was calculated from the gel shown as well as two identical gels. The template was a dilution series of plasmid DNA, and the numbers above the lanes on the gel picture and on the X-axis on the diagram show the number of plasmids added to each NucleoLink well. As seen, it was possible to detect the faint bands in the lane with 18,000 copies added after scanning the gel. The next dilution with 1,800 copies yielded bands which were faintly visible on the three gels, but the scanning equipment could not detect these bands. The last dilution, where 180 copies were added, were negative on all three agarose gels. The DIAPOPS, however, detected this dilution in all three samples, as is seen in the right-hand diagram. The system has an annealing temperature of 40ºC and uses 40 temperature cycles. With this system the DIAPOPS detection clearly has a much lower detection limit than the gel.

3. Difference between standard symmetrical PCR and asymmetrical PCR
The gels presented in Figures 1 and 2 show PCR products from reactions from an asymmetrical PCR ( Asymmetric amplification) performed in NucleoLink wells coated with a solid phase primer. The asymmetrical PCR is optimal for DIAPOPS ( Primer ratio in the PCR mix for the asymmetric DIAPOPS amplification). Differences have been observed in the liquid phase product concentration between standard, symmetrical PCR ( General PCR introduction) and asymmetrical PCR. The standard symmetrical PCR often yields a higher liquid phase product concentration. However, this difference in concentration is normally very small, and there is no difference between the limits of detection. In systems where this difference in concentrations was apparent it has been found that the DIAPOPS could be optimized ( Introduction) to give the same liquid phase PCR product concentration as the standard, symmetrical PCR performed in uncoated PCR vessels.


Figure 2: The left-hand picture shows the analysis of liquid phase PCR products on an agarose gel. The right-hand diagram shows the corresponding DIAPOPS signals and the quantifications of the liquid phase PCR product. The quantification were calculated from the gel shown as well as three identical gels. The template was a dilution series of plasmid DNA and the numbers above the lanes on the gel picture and on the X-axis of the diagram show the number of plasmids added to each NucleoLink well. In the samples with 2,000 copies added, faint bands were observed on the gel from three of four samples. However, the scanning equipment could not detect these faint bands. The DIAPOPS clearly detected the three gel positive samples, but was negative with the fourth gel negative sample. The system has an annealing temperature of 55ºC and uses 40 temperature cycles. With this system the gel and the DIAPOPS have identical detection limits.

4. Conclusion
The concentration of the solid phase product, and therefore also the hybridization detection in DIAPOPS is directly correlated to the liquid phase amplification. The ratio between the amount of solid phase products and the concentration of liquid phase product is not maintained between DIAPOPS systems. Therefore, no fixed ratio between the DIAPOPS signal and the actual amount of liquid phase PCR products can be given.

Concentration of liquid phase PCR products in a standard symmetrical PCR is normally the same or only slightly higher than the liquid phase PCR product concentration in an asymmetric amplification used in DIAPOPS ( Asymmetric amplification). The limit of detection is often better with DIAPOPS compared to standard agarose gel electrophoresis, and has never been observed to be inferior to the detection limit found on agarose gel ( DIAPOPS advantages).